• 南京醫(yī)科大學(xué)附屬南京醫(yī)院（南京市第一醫(yī)院）骨科（南京，210006）;

目的?通過(guò)與SL-PLUS標(biāo)準(zhǔn)假體比較，探討采用SL-PLUS MIA股骨柄假體行人工全髖關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù)（total hip arthroplasty，THA）的近期療效。?方法?回顧分析2011年6月－12月采用SL-PLUS MIA股骨柄假體行THA的33例38髖患者（試驗(yàn)組）臨床資料，并與同期35例40髖采用SL-PLUS 標(biāo)準(zhǔn)假體行THA的患者（對(duì)照組）比較。兩組患者性別、年齡、病程、病因及術(shù)前髖關(guān)節(jié)活動(dòng)度、Harris評(píng)分比較，差異均無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義（P  gt; 0.05），具有可比性。記錄兩組切口長(zhǎng)度、手術(shù)時(shí)間及術(shù)中出血量，術(shù)后采用Harris評(píng)分評(píng)估髖關(guān)節(jié)功能改善情況，檢查髖關(guān)節(jié)活動(dòng)度，復(fù)查X 線片了解假體位置。?結(jié)果?試驗(yàn)組切口長(zhǎng)度、手術(shù)時(shí)間均較對(duì)照組縮短，術(shù)中出血量亦顯著降低，差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義（P  lt; 0.05）。 術(shù)后兩組切口均Ⅰ期愈合?；颊呔@隨訪，隨訪時(shí)間10～16個(gè)月，平均13.6個(gè)月。隨訪時(shí)對(duì)照組5例5 髖及試驗(yàn)組3例3髖有髖關(guān)節(jié)疼痛不適表現(xiàn)。末次隨訪時(shí)，試驗(yàn)組及對(duì)照組患者髖關(guān)節(jié)活動(dòng)度分別為（152.48 ± 9.68）°及（152.16 ± 8.18）°、Harris評(píng)分分別為（91.4 ± 2.9）分及（90.9 ± 1.8）分，均較術(shù)前顯著提高（P  lt; 0.05）；兩組間比較差異均無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義（P  gt; 0.05）。X線片復(fù)查示兩組假體位置均良好，無(wú)移位、松動(dòng)及下沉發(fā)生。?結(jié)論?與SL-PLUS 標(biāo)準(zhǔn)假 體比較，采用SL-PLUS MIA股骨柄假體行THA 具有手術(shù)創(chuàng)傷小、出血少的優(yōu)點(diǎn)，近期療效滿意，遠(yuǎn)期療效需進(jìn)一步觀察。

引用本文： 魏波,王黎明,金成哲,徐燕. SL-PLUS MIA股骨柄假體在人工全髖關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù)中的初步應(yīng)用. 中國(guó)修復(fù)重建外科雜志, 2013, 27(3): 283-287. doi: 復(fù)制

版權(quán)信息： ?四川大學(xué)華西醫(yī)院華西期刊社《中國(guó)修復(fù)重建外科雜志》版權(quán)所有，未經(jīng)授權(quán)不得轉(zhuǎn)載、改編

1. Martin R, Clayson PE, Troussel S, et al. Anterolateral minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled study with a follow-up of 1 year. J Arthroplasty, 2011, 26(8): 1362-1372.
2. Pflüger G, Junk-Jantsch S, Schöll V. Minimally invasive total hip replacement via the anterolateral approach in the supine position. Int Orthop, 2007, 31 Suppl 1: S7-11.
3. Roger DJ, Hill D. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty using a transpiriformis approach: a preliminary report. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2012, 470(8): 2227-2234.
4. Sendtner E, Schuster T, Wörner M, et al. Accuracy of acetabular cup placement in computer-assisted, minimally-invasive THR in a lateral decubitus position. Int Orthop, 2011, 35(6): 809-815.
5. Labek G, Kovac S, Levasic V, et al. The outcome of the cementless tapered SL-Plus stem: an analysis of arthroplasty register data. Int Orthop, 2012, 36(6): 1149-1154.
6. Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 1969, 51(4): 737-755.
7. Wenz JF, Gurkan I, Jibodh SR. Mini-incision total hip arthroplasty: a comparative assessment of perioperative outcomes. Orthopedics, 2002, 25(10): 1031-1043.
8. Barrack RL. The mini-incision: occasionally desirable, but rarely necessary. Orthopedics, 2004, 27(9): 936, 945.
9. Hallert O, Li Y, Brismar H, et al. The direct anterior approach: initial experience of a minimally invasive technique for total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg Res, 2012, 7: 17.
10. Schleicher I, Haas H, Adams TS, et al. Minimal-invasive posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty versus standard lateral approach. Acta Orthop Belg, 2011, 77(4): 480-487.
11. 孫仕華, 王栓科, 趙琳, 等. 后外側(cè)入路傳統(tǒng)及微創(chuàng)人工全髖關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù)對(duì)比研究. 中國(guó)修復(fù)重建外科雜志, 2009, 23(6): 641-643.
12. Yoon TR, Park KS, Song EK, et al. New two-incision minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: comparison with the one-incision method. J Orthop Sci, 2009, 14(2): 155-160.
13. 張先龍, 沈?yàn)? 畦述平, 等. 雙切口微創(chuàng)人工全髖關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù). 中華骨科雜志, 2005, 25(5): 268-270.
14. Noble PC, Pflüger G, Junk-Jantsch S, et al. The optimal skin incision for minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty performed via the anterolateral approach. J Arthroplasty, 2012, 27(6): 901-908.
15. Bertin KC, Röttinger H. Anterolateral mini-incision hip replacement surgery: a modified Watson-Jones approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2004, (429): 248-255.
16. 吳若, 徐耀增, 耿德春, 等. 改良Watson-Jones入路與改良Hardinge入路全髖關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù)的療效比較. 中華創(chuàng)傷骨科雜志, 2011, 13(11): 1003-1007.
17. Waddell JP, Morton J, Schemitsch EH. The role of total hip replacement in intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2004, (429): 49-53.
18. Sidhu AS, Singh AP, Singh AP, et al. Total hip replacement as primary treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients. Int Orthop, 2010, 34(6): 789-792.
19. Fan L, Dang X, Wang K. Comparison between bipolar hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly osteoporotic patients. PLoS One, 2012, 7(6): e39531.
  1. 1. Martin R, Clayson PE, Troussel S, et al. Anterolateral minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled study with a follow-up of 1 year. J Arthroplasty, 2011, 26(8): 1362-1372.
  2. 2. Pflüger G, Junk-Jantsch S, Schöll V. Minimally invasive total hip replacement via the anterolateral approach in the supine position. Int Orthop, 2007, 31 Suppl 1: S7-11.
  3. 3. Roger DJ, Hill D. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty using a transpiriformis approach: a preliminary report. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2012, 470(8): 2227-2234.
  4. 4. Sendtner E, Schuster T, Wörner M, et al. Accuracy of acetabular cup placement in computer-assisted, minimally-invasive THR in a lateral decubitus position. Int Orthop, 2011, 35(6): 809-815.
  5. 5. Labek G, Kovac S, Levasic V, et al. The outcome of the cementless tapered SL-Plus stem: an analysis of arthroplasty register data. Int Orthop, 2012, 36(6): 1149-1154.
  6. 6. Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 1969, 51(4): 737-755.
  7. 7. Wenz JF, Gurkan I, Jibodh SR. Mini-incision total hip arthroplasty: a comparative assessment of perioperative outcomes. Orthopedics, 2002, 25(10): 1031-1043.
  8. 8. Barrack RL. The mini-incision: occasionally desirable, but rarely necessary. Orthopedics, 2004, 27(9): 936, 945.
  9. 9. Hallert O, Li Y, Brismar H, et al. The direct anterior approach: initial experience of a minimally invasive technique for total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg Res, 2012, 7: 17.
  10. 10. Schleicher I, Haas H, Adams TS, et al. Minimal-invasive posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty versus standard lateral approach. Acta Orthop Belg, 2011, 77(4): 480-487.
  11. 11. 孫仕華, 王栓科, 趙琳, 等. 后外側(cè)入路傳統(tǒng)及微創(chuàng)人工全髖關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù)對(duì)比研究. 中國(guó)修復(fù)重建外科雜志, 2009, 23(6): 641-643.
  12. 12. Yoon TR, Park KS, Song EK, et al. New two-incision minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: comparison with the one-incision method. J Orthop Sci, 2009, 14(2): 155-160.
  13. 13. 張先龍, 沈?yàn)? 畦述平, 等. 雙切口微創(chuàng)人工全髖關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù). 中華骨科雜志, 2005, 25(5): 268-270.
  14. 14. Noble PC, Pflüger G, Junk-Jantsch S, et al. The optimal skin incision for minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty performed via the anterolateral approach. J Arthroplasty, 2012, 27(6): 901-908.
  15. 15. Bertin KC, Röttinger H. Anterolateral mini-incision hip replacement surgery: a modified Watson-Jones approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2004, (429): 248-255.
  16. 16. 吳若, 徐耀增, 耿德春, 等. 改良Watson-Jones入路與改良Hardinge入路全髖關(guān)節(jié)置換術(shù)的療效比較. 中華創(chuàng)傷骨科雜志, 2011, 13(11): 1003-1007.
  17. 17. Waddell JP, Morton J, Schemitsch EH. The role of total hip replacement in intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2004, (429): 49-53.
  18. 18. Sidhu AS, Singh AP, Singh AP, et al. Total hip replacement as primary treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients. Int Orthop, 2010, 34(6): 789-792.
  19. 19. Fan L, Dang X, Wang K. Comparison between bipolar hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly osteoporotic patients. PLoS One, 2012, 7(6): e39531.

  • 上一篇

    雙錐度生物固定型股骨柄治療髖關(guān)節(jié)骨性融合的療效

  • 下一篇

    關(guān)節(jié)鏡輔助下與開放性踝關(guān)節(jié)融合術(shù)的療效比較