• 1.汕頭大學(xué)醫(yī)學(xué)院附屬粵北人民醫(yī)院普外科(韶關(guān)512026);;
  • 2.浙江大學(xué)醫(yī)學(xué)院第二附屬醫(yī)院普外科(杭州310009);

目的  比較胃腸道漿肌層吻合、黏膜外吻合、一層吻合和二層吻合對(duì)吻合愈合的影響。
方法  家兔分成4組,即漿肌層吻合組、二層吻合組、一層吻合組和黏膜外吻合組。每組10只,每只動(dòng)物行1個(gè)胃十二指腸側(cè)側(cè)吻合、2個(gè)回腸端端吻合和2個(gè)結(jié)腸端端吻合。術(shù)后第3和7 d,每組分別各取5只動(dòng)物,測(cè)定吻合破裂壓(ABP)、組織羥脯氨酸(HP)含量并做病理檢查。
結(jié)果  術(shù)后第3 d,各組ABP間差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P gt;0.05)。術(shù)后第7 d, 二層吻合、一層吻合和黏膜外吻合的ABP間差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P gt;0.05); 胃十二指腸漿肌層吻合的ABP高于二層吻合和一層吻合(P<0.05); 回腸漿肌層吻合的ABP高于二層吻合(P<0.01); 結(jié)腸漿肌層吻合的ABP高于二層吻合、一層吻合和黏膜外吻合(P<0.05)。術(shù)后第3 d,胃十二指腸和回腸吻合的各組HP含量無(wú)明顯差異,結(jié)腸二層吻合HP含量高于一層吻合(P<0.05); 術(shù)后第7 d回腸、結(jié)腸吻合的各組HP含量差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P gt;0.05), 胃十二指腸漿肌層吻合HP含量高于二層吻合(P<0.025)。術(shù)后第3 d,胃十二指腸和回腸吻合的各組炎癥程度相似,結(jié)腸黏膜外吻合的炎癥反應(yīng)輕于二層吻合(P<0.05); 術(shù)后第7 d,胃十二指腸和結(jié)腸吻合的各組炎癥程度相似,回腸漿肌層吻合炎癥反應(yīng)輕于二層吻合(P<0.05)。術(shù)后第7 d,胃腸道吻合各組黏膜愈合指數(shù)差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P gt;0.05)。
結(jié)論  胃腸道漿肌層吻合和其他手工吻合一樣安全可靠,但更加簡(jiǎn)便。

引用本文: 黃從云,王建南,彭淑牖,張濤,李秉健,徐立. 胃腸道漿肌層吻合、黏膜外吻合、一層吻合和二層吻合的實(shí)驗(yàn)比較研究. 中國(guó)普外基礎(chǔ)與臨床雜志, 2007, 14(4): 432-436. doi: 復(fù)制

1.  黃從云, 彭淑牖. 胃腸道吻合沿革 [J] . 中華胃腸外科雜志, 2005; 8(6)∶545.
2.  Leslie A, Steele RJ. The interrupted serosubmucosal anastomosis-still the gold standard [J] . Colorectal Dis, 2003; 5(4)∶362.
3.  Kuzu MA, Koksoy C, Kale IT, et al. Reperfusion injury delays healing of intestinal anastomosis in a rat [J] . Am J Surg, 1998; 176(4)∶348.
4.  孔璐, 王繼峰, 周子悅, 等. 堿解法測(cè)定組織羥脯氨酸的實(shí)驗(yàn)研究 [J] . 中國(guó)骨質(zhì)疏松雜志, 2003; 9(4)∶319.
5.  Polat C, Arikan Y, Vatansev C, et al. The effects of increased intraabdominal pressure on colonic anastomoses [J] . Surg Endosc, 2002; 16(9)∶1314.
6.  Durmus M, Karaaslan E, Ozturk E, et al. The effects of single-dose dexamethasone on wound healing in rats [J] . Anesth Analg, 2003; 97(5)∶1377.
7.  Witte MB, Barbul A. Repair of full-thickness bowel injury [J] . Crit Care Med, 2003; 31(8 Suppl)∶S538.
8.  黃從云, 彭淑牖. 腸道吻合愈合研究進(jìn)展 [J] . 國(guó)外醫(yī)學(xué)·外科學(xué)分冊(cè), 2005; 32(2)∶114.
9.  Gottrup F. Oxygen, wound healing and the development of infection. Present status [J] . Eur J Surg, 2002; 168(5)∶260.
10.  Houdart R, Lavergne A, Valleur P, et al. Vascular evolution of single-layer end-on colonic anastomosis. A microangiographic study of 180 anastomoses in the rat from two to 180 days [J] . Dis Colon Rectum, 1985; 28(7)∶475.
11.  Jansen A, Becker AE, Brummelkamp WH, et al. The importance of the apposition of the submucosal intestinal layers for primary wound healing of intestinal anastomosis [J] . Surg Gynecol Obstet, 1981; 152(1)∶51.
12.  Shikata S, Yamagishi H, Taji Y, et al. Single-versus two-layer intestinal anastomosis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J] . BMC Surg, 2006; 6(1)∶2.
  1. 1.  黃從云, 彭淑牖. 胃腸道吻合沿革 [J] . 中華胃腸外科雜志, 2005; 8(6)∶545.
  2. 2.  Leslie A, Steele RJ. The interrupted serosubmucosal anastomosis-still the gold standard [J] . Colorectal Dis, 2003; 5(4)∶362.
  3. 3.  Kuzu MA, Koksoy C, Kale IT, et al. Reperfusion injury delays healing of intestinal anastomosis in a rat [J] . Am J Surg, 1998; 176(4)∶348.
  4. 4.  孔璐, 王繼峰, 周子悅, 等. 堿解法測(cè)定組織羥脯氨酸的實(shí)驗(yàn)研究 [J] . 中國(guó)骨質(zhì)疏松雜志, 2003; 9(4)∶319.
  5. 5.  Polat C, Arikan Y, Vatansev C, et al. The effects of increased intraabdominal pressure on colonic anastomoses [J] . Surg Endosc, 2002; 16(9)∶1314.
  6. 6.  Durmus M, Karaaslan E, Ozturk E, et al. The effects of single-dose dexamethasone on wound healing in rats [J] . Anesth Analg, 2003; 97(5)∶1377.
  7. 7.  Witte MB, Barbul A. Repair of full-thickness bowel injury [J] . Crit Care Med, 2003; 31(8 Suppl)∶S538.
  8. 8.  黃從云, 彭淑牖. 腸道吻合愈合研究進(jìn)展 [J] . 國(guó)外醫(yī)學(xué)·外科學(xué)分冊(cè), 2005; 32(2)∶114.
  9. 9.  Gottrup F. Oxygen, wound healing and the development of infection. Present status [J] . Eur J Surg, 2002; 168(5)∶260.
  10. 10.  Houdart R, Lavergne A, Valleur P, et al. Vascular evolution of single-layer end-on colonic anastomosis. A microangiographic study of 180 anastomoses in the rat from two to 180 days [J] . Dis Colon Rectum, 1985; 28(7)∶475.
  11. 11.  Jansen A, Becker AE, Brummelkamp WH, et al. The importance of the apposition of the submucosal intestinal layers for primary wound healing of intestinal anastomosis [J] . Surg Gynecol Obstet, 1981; 152(1)∶51.
  12. 12.  Shikata S, Yamagishi H, Taji Y, et al. Single-versus two-layer intestinal anastomosis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J] . BMC Surg, 2006; 6(1)∶2.